aside from Harry Osborn turning into a hero (at the behest of his own "Alfred the Butler"), the other pet peeve i have over Spider-Man 3 (and i slowly realized that over the years) is that Kiki Dunst is no Mary Jane Watson.
i mean, this statuette is more stunning and has more personality than Kiki.
Kiki has nothing on this va-va-voom! (and that term used to be exclusive to Betty, which in the Spidey canon, is Gwen Stacy, as opposed to MJ's Veronica)
too bad, there's a waiting list. is that because they're auditioning her for Spider-Man 4? why do you need to audition her? she's a lock, dammit!
i realize that the statuette has created such a furor among feminists and female fans, and made national news, but c'mon ... its just a statue. there were more scantily-clad and provocatively-posing female comic characters in last February's NY Comic-Con. and i don't even mean the porcelain ones. i didn't see anyone raising a howl of protest. they're still publishing Vampirella, right?
thanks, Adam Hughes, for saving us from Kiki Dunst. can we digitally edit the upcoming Spider-Man 3 DVD and replace the Dunster with your creation?
No comments:
Post a Comment