tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134432059441459347.post6363492007162747876..comments2023-06-06T12:12:57.147-04:00Comments on digital tales of graphic narratives: 4 > 3 > 2grifterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05556411916511473678noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134432059441459347.post-80002036665238126352009-09-10T23:31:03.004-04:002009-09-10T23:31:03.004-04:00totally agree with you, Rob. he looks ridiculous. ...totally agree with you, Rob. he looks ridiculous. i guess the writers just painted themselves into a corner.grifterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05556411916511473678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134432059441459347.post-14534842085367504832009-09-06T08:02:39.960-04:002009-09-06T08:02:39.960-04:00I guess if you're about 10, you'd probably...I guess if you're about 10, you'd probably look at this picture and go, "Cooool!". However for older readers you can't help feel a little disillusioned as this guy just looks like an example of "Hey, we'd better make this guy look waaay tougher than Wolverine." Instead he just looks like lame, underwhelming pastiche. For what it's worth, I always think low key is better. When you present a villain as some kind of 'ultimate' villain like Sabretooth once was or Magneto or Apocalypse to the X-Men, as a creator, you keep having to top yourself. And that leads you to ending up with something as bizarre as this.<br /><br />Just my rant.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14043078354705212096noreply@blogger.com